Global Agencies

The UN's "One Health" Agenda: The Global Power Grab Nobody's Talking About

You've read about the Canadian officials who ordered the ostrich massacre. You've seen how they destroyed natural immunity research while funding dangerous gain-of-function labs. You've learned how Canada surrendered health sovereignty to the WHO.

Avery Lane

14 Nov 2025 • 15 min read

Photo by Wolfgang Hasselmann / Unsplash

When 330 ostriches were killed in Canada, the orders didn't come from Ottawa or Geneva. They came from a UN-controlled framework most people have never heard of.

The Question That Changes Everything

You've read about the Canadian officials who ordered the ostrich massacre.

You've seen how they destroyed natural immunity research while funding dangerous gain-of-function labs.

You've learned how Canada surrendered health sovereignty to the WHO.

But here's the question no one asked:

Who controls the WHO?

The answer leads to a sprawling United Nations framework called "One Health" - a coordinated takeover of animal, human, plant, and environmental policy worldwide.

And the ostrich massacre was just a demonstration of how well it works.

Meet the "Quadripartite": The Four Horsemen of Global Health Control

In March 2022, while the world was still reeling from COVID, four international organizations quietly signed an agreement to coordinate all global health policy.

They call themselves "The Quadripartite."

The Four Organizations:

FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme
WHO - World Health Organization (UN specialized agency)
WOAH - World Organisation for Animal Health

Notice something?

Three of the four are UN agencies. The fourth (WOAH) coordinates directly with them.

This isn't "international cooperation." This is a unified command structure.

What Is "One Health"? The Framework That Rules Your Life

According to the Quadripartite themselves:

"One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, plants and ecosystems."

Sounds nice, right?

Here's what it actually means:

One centralized system controlling:

Animal health (your livestock, your pets)
Human health (your medical decisions)
Plant health (your food supply)
Environmental policy (your land use, your water, your energy)

All coordinated by four unelected international organizations.

All justified by "health threats at the human-animal-environment interface."

All implemented without your consent.

The Timeline: How the UN Built the One Health Empire

2008: The Foundation

WHO, FAO, and WOAH establish the first "One Health" strategic framework. The concept: all health issues are connected, so all health policy should be coordinated.

2019: The Planning

FAO, WOAH, and WHO publish a guide for approaching zoonotic disease using the One Health framework. The blueprint is ready.

2020-2021: The Opportunity

COVID-19 provides the perfect justification. The Quadripartite leadership meets at the Paris Peace Forum in November 2020 and decides to formalize their collaboration.

February 2021: The Expansion

The three organizations invite UNEP (UN Environment Programme) to join. The "Tripartite" becomes the "Quadripartite." Now they control animal health, human health, AND environmental policy.

March 2022: The Agreement

The four organizations sign a Memorandum of Understanding, officially creating the Quadripartite partnership. The One Health framework is now the official global governance structure.

October 2022: The Action Plan

The Quadripartite launches the "One Health Joint Plan of Action" - the operational document that actually governs how countries respond to "health threats."

This is the document Canada follows. This is why the ostriches died.

2023-2025: The Implementation

The Quadripartite holds annual executive meetings (Kenya 2024, Paris 2025) to expand One Health implementation. They establish the "One Health High-Level Expert Panel" to provide "scientific guidance." They advocate for One Health integration in G20 meetings, UN General Assembly declarations, climate conferences (COP16, COP29), and national policies worldwide.

By 2025, the One Health framework governs health policy in virtually every country on Earth.

Most people have never heard of it.

How It Actually Works: The Chain of Command

Here's the structure that killed the ostriches:

Level 1: The Quadripartite (UN-Controlled)

Sets "One Health" protocols and standards
Declares what constitutes a health emergency
Defines mandatory response measures (like "stamping out")

Level 2: WOAH (World Organisation for Animal Health)

Translates One Health policy into specific animal health protocols
Defines "stamping out" as mandatory killing of all exposed animals
Establishes "international standards" for disease response

Level 3: WHO (World Health Organization)

Coordinates with WOAH to ensure human health policies align with animal health protocols
Issues "guidance" that member nations treat as binding
Declares "pandemic emergencies" that trigger mandatory protocols

Level 4: National Governments (Like Canada)

Sign agreements to follow WHO/WOAH protocols
Surrender decision-making authority to "international standards"
Implement whatever the Quadripartite demands

Level 5: Enforcement Agencies (Like CFIA)

Follow orders from above without discretion
Claim "we have no choice" because, legally, they don't
Enforce One Health protocols with police and armed contractors

Level 6: Citizens (You)

No vote on any of this
No ability to challenge the protocols
No recourse when your property is destroyed or your rights are violated

That's the chain. UN at the top. You at the bottom. Nothing democratic about it.

The "One Health Joint Plan of Action": Your New Rulebook

The October 2022 document that governs global health response includes:

Operational Objectives:

"Providing a framework for collective and coordinated action to mainstream the One Health approach at all levels"
"Providing upstream policy and legislative advice and technical assistance to help set national targets and priorities"
"Promoting multinational, multi-sector, multidisciplinary collaboration"

Translation:

UN agencies tell countries what health policies to adopt
Countries implement these policies as "national targets"
All sectors (human health, animal health, environment) must coordinate under One Health

What This Means in Practice:

For the ostriches:

WOAH defines "stamping out" protocol
Canada adopts it as "national policy"
CFIA enforces it without discretion
330 birds die

For you:

Quadripartite defines "health threats"
Your country adopts mandatory response measures
Officials enforce them "without delay"
You comply or face consequences

The One Health High-Level Expert Panel: The Unelected Rulers

In May 2021, the Quadripartite appointed 26 international "experts" to serve on the One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP).

From over 700 applications, they selected 26 people to advise the Quadripartite on how to implement One Health globally.

Who are these people?

Scientists from various disciplines
Policy advisors
Public health experts
Environmental specialists

Who elected them? Nobody.

Who do they answer to? The Quadripartite organizations.

What authority do they have? They provide "scientific and policy advice" that shapes global health protocols.

Their current mandate includes:

"Mapping international legal and policy instruments that have a bearing on One Health"
"Analyzing barriers and enablers of One Health implementation"
Developing "governance" frameworks for One Health

Translation: They're identifying which laws stand in the way of One Health implementation and figuring out how to change them.

The second term of OHHLEP was established in 2024 with expanded expertise in "social sciences, economics, and governance."

Why governance? Because implementing One Health requires changing how countries are governed.

And these 26 unelected people are writing the playbook.

The Language That Hides the Truth

The Quadripartite uses carefully crafted language to hide what they're actually doing. Here's the decoder ring:

What They Say: "Integrated approach"

What It Means: Centralized control across all sectors

What They Say: "Sustainably balance and optimize"

What It Means: Subordinate all competing interests to their priorities

What They Say: "Whole-of-government, whole-of-society approach"

What It Means: Every part of your life falls under their jurisdiction

What They Say: "Address health threats at the human-animal-environment interface"

What It Means: Anything can be declared a "health threat" requiring intervention

What They Say: "International standards and guidance"

What It Means: Mandatory protocols you can't refuse without consequences

What They Say: "Collective action" and "coordinated response"

What It Means: Nations must do what we say, when we say it

What They Say: "Stamping out policy"

What It Means: Kill everything exposed, no exceptions

The ostriches learned what these phrases actually mean.

Why COVID Was Perfect for One Health

The pandemic was the perfect demonstration of why the world supposedly "needs" One Health:

The Narrative:

COVID-19 was a zoonotic disease (animal to human transmission)
Only coordinated global response could stop it
National sovereignty got in the way of effective response
Countries needed to follow international protocols "without delay"

What One Health Delivered:

Lockdowns coordinated globally
Vaccine mandates justified internationally
Border restrictions standardized worldwide
Censorship of "misinformation" harmonized across nations
All sold as necessary for "health and safety"

And it worked.

Countries followed WHO guidance almost perfectly. Citizens complied. Dissent was crushed. Emergency powers were normalized.

The Quadripartite saw COVID-19 as proof their system works.

WHO Director-General Tedros said it explicitly in 2022:

"It's clear that a One Health approach must be central to our shared work to strengthen the world's defences against epidemics and pandemics such as COVID-19. That's why One Health is one of the guiding principles of the new international agreement for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response."

COVID wasn't a failure of global health coordination.

It was a successful test of the One Health system.

The 2024-2025 Expansion: One Health Goes Mainstream

While Canadians were distracted by the ostrich saga, the Quadripartite was expanding One Health implementation globally:

March 2025: Third Quadripartite Executive Annual Meeting

Held at WOAH headquarters in Paris. The four organizations issued "A Unified Call for One Health" demanding:

"Urgent, strategic, and sustained support and investments to scale up One Health implementation worldwide"
Integration of One Health in "major discussions and declarations"
"Mobilizing investments" through "structured outreach to funding partners"

UN General Assembly Political Declaration on AMR

The Quadripartite helped draft and supported adoption of a UN declaration on antimicrobial resistance using the One Health framework.

G20 Integration

One Health advocacy in G20 Health Ministerial discussions and declarations.

Climate Conference Integration

COP16: Global Action Plan on Biodiversity and Health adopted
COP29: High-level One Health event promoting "climate-health policy integration"

See the pattern?

One Health is being woven into EVERY major international framework:

UN declarations
G20 policy
Climate agreements
Biodiversity conventions
Trade standards

Once it's embedded everywhere, there's no escape.

The Trade Weapon: How They Force Compliance

Countries can't just refuse One Health protocols. Here's why:

The Lever: International Trade

If a country deviates from WOAH/Quadripartite standards:

Trading partners can ban their agricultural imports
They're labeled "non-compliant" with international biosecurity
Their entire export market collapses

Canada justified the ostrich massacre by citing the need to protect "$6.8 billion in poultry industry" and "$1.75 billion in annual poultry exports."

The threat is clear:

Follow One Health protocols → Keep trade access
Deviate from protocols → Lose billions in exports

This is how the UN forces compliance without armies.

They don't need to invade. They just need to control trade standards. And if One Health protocols become the required standard for international trade, countries have no choice but to implement them.

That's why Canada couldn't save the ostriches. That's why no Canadian official had discretion. That's why "we had no choice" was literally true.

Break the One Health protocol, lose trade access. It's that simple.

What "One Health" Really Controls

The scope of One Health authority is staggering. According to the Quadripartite, One Health governs:

Animal Health:

All livestock (cattle, pigs, chickens, turkeys, ostriches)
Companion animals (your pets)
Wildlife (anything that might contact domestic animals)
"Stamping out" protocols for disease control

Human Health:

Pandemic response (lockdowns, mandates, restrictions)
Vaccine policy (development, distribution, requirements)
Disease surveillance (monitoring populations)
Medical interventions (what treatments are approved)

Plant Health:

Food production (what can be grown, how)
Agricultural practices (which methods are allowed)
Crop disease management (mandatory destruction protocols)

Environmental Policy:

Land use (how property can be used)
Water management (access and control)
Climate policy (energy, emissions, restrictions)
Biodiversity (protected species, habitat rules)

Cross-Cutting Issues:

Antimicrobial resistance
Food safety standards
Biosecurity measures
Information control ("misinformation" on health topics)

In other words, One Health claims authority over virtually every aspect of human life.

From what you can raise on your property to what you can put in your body, from how you use your land to what information you're allowed to share—if it touches "health" (which is everything), One Health has a say.

The "Barriers" They're Removing

Remember OHHLEP's mandate to identify "barriers and enablers of One Health implementation"?

Here's what they consider "barriers":

National Sovereignty

When countries want to make independent decisions instead of following Quadripartite protocols.

Property Rights

When owners object to destruction of their animals, crops, or land for "biosecurity."

Democratic Process

When citizens demand parliamentary debate or referendum before surrendering authority.

Constitutional Protections

When charters or constitutions protect individual rights that conflict with collective mandates.

Information Freedom

When people share scientific evidence that contradicts official One Health narratives.

Local Knowledge

When farmers, veterinarians, or citizens propose alternatives to centralized protocols.

These aren't bugs in the system. They're obstacles to be overcome.

And the Quadripartite is actively working to "remove barriers" to implementation.

The Countries Pushing Back (And Why Canada Isn't One of Them)

Not every country bent the knee:

United States

President Trump withdrew from WHO in January 2025, explicitly refusing to subordinate American sovereignty to unelected international bodies.

Germany, Austria, Italy, Czech Republic

All pushed back on binding WHO authority, insisting on maintaining national sovereignty over health decisions while continuing "international cooperation."

What These Countries Understand:

Cooperation doesn't require subordination. You can share information and coordinate responses without surrendering decision-making authority.

Canada's Choice:

Canada did the opposite. Rather than maintain sovereignty while cooperating, Canada surrendered authority in exchange for trade access and "global leadership" status.

Canadian officials chose trade over sovereignty. They chose international approval over democratic accountability. They chose compliance over citizens.

And when 330 ostriches paid the price, those officials could shrug and say "One Health protocols required it."

The Future Under One Health

Here's what the next "health emergency" looks like under fully implemented One Health:

Phase 1: The Declaration

The Quadripartite (through WHO/WOAH) declares a "pandemic emergency" or "zoonotic outbreak."

Phase 2: The Protocol Activation

One Health protocols are triggered. Countries are obligated to implement them "without delay."

Phase 3: The Enforcement

National agencies (like CFIA) enforce protocols using legal authority backed by police/military if needed.

Phase 4: The Suppression

Alternative approaches are blocked (they conflict with protocols). Dissent is labeled "misinformation." Property rights are overridden for "biosecurity."

Phase 5: The Compliance

Citizens comply or face consequences: fines, imprisonment, property destruction, loss of livelihood, social exclusion.

Phase 6: The Normalization

The emergency becomes the new normal. Powers aren't surrendered. Infrastructure remains. Another "threat" eventually triggers the cycle again.

This isn't speculation. This is exactly what happened during COVID.

And the One Health framework makes it permanent global policy.

Why This Matters More Than Anything Else

You might be thinking: "This is about bird flu and ostriches. It doesn't affect me."

You're wrong.

One Health isn't about animals or plants or environment. It's about control.

It's About:

Who decides what you can grow, raise, or harvest
Who determines what medical interventions you must accept
Who controls what information you're allowed to access
Who has authority to declare emergencies and suspend rights
Who owns the authority to override your property, your choices, your freedom

And the answer to all these questions is no longer "your elected government."

It's "The UN Quadripartite and their One Health protocols."

The ostriches were just the proof of concept.

The Questions Nobody's Asking

Question 1: If One Health is just "coordinated health response," why does it require removing "barriers" like national sovereignty and constitutional protections?

Because it's not about coordination. It's about control.

Question 2: If these protocols are really necessary for public health, why can't they be debated and approved democratically?

Because democratic debate might reject them.

Question 3: If One Health is so beneficial, why is it being implemented quietly through international agreements most people never hear about?

Because transparency would generate resistance.

Question 4: Who benefits when four UN-dominated organizations control animal health, human health, plant health, and environmental policy worldwide?

Not you. Not farmers. Not property owners. Not citizens.

Question 5: If countries like the US, Germany, and Austria can maintain sovereignty while cooperating internationally, why did Canada surrender authority instead?

Because Canadian officials chose institutional power and trade access over democratic accountability.

Question 6: When the next "health emergency" is declared, will Canadians have any say in how their government responds?

No. The protocols are already written. Canada already agreed to implement them "without delay."

The Ostrich Massacre Finally Makes Sense

With full knowledge of the One Health structure, let's revisit what happened:

The Facts:

H5N1 outbreak killed 15% of ostrich flock
85% survived, appeared healthy for nearly a year
Multiple alternatives proposed (testing, relocation, research)
All alternatives rejected
330 birds shot to death

The Real Reason:

WOAH (part of UN-controlled Quadripartite) defines "stamping out" as mandatory protocol
One Health Joint Plan of Action requires countries to implement WOAH standards
Canada agreed to treat these protocols as binding
CFIA has no discretion to deviate
Courts enforce international agreements Canada signed
Birds die because One Health protocols required it

Not Canadian policy. UN policy. Not WHO guidance. Quadripartite protocol. Not bureaucratic failure. The system working exactly as designed.

The ostriches died to prove One Health works.

What Comes Next

The Quadripartite isn't finished. They're expanding:

Upcoming Initiatives:

"Mobilizing investments for One Health" (getting countries to fund their own takeover)
"Community of Practice on One Health governance" (teaching nations how to implement)
Integration with G20, UN General Assembly, climate conferences
Expansion of OHHLEP authority
"Joint Offer" for targeted One Health investments

Their Stated Goal:

"Ensuring that One Health is effectively implemented, leaving no one behind."

Translation: Complete global implementation. No exceptions.

What This Means:

The next farm outbreak → Stamping out protocol
The next pandemic → One Health response measures The next "environmental threat" → Coordinated restrictions The next "food safety crisis" → Centralized control

All justified by One Health.
All coordinated by the UN Quadripartite.
All implemented "without delay."
All without your consent.

The Three-Stage Takeover

Looking back, the pattern is clear:

Stage 1: COVID (2020-2022)

Test the system
Normalize emergency powers
Crush dissent
Prove populations will comply

Stage 2: Formalization (2022-2025)

Launch One Health Joint Plan of Action
Get countries to adopt protocols as "binding"
Integrate into all major international frameworks
Remove "barriers" to implementation

Stage 3: Permanent Implementation (2025-Future)

One Health becomes standard global governance
Emergency powers become routine policy
National sovereignty subordinated to "international standards"
Citizens have no mechanism to resist

We're currently in Stage 2, transitioning to Stage 3.

The ostrich massacre happened during this transition—a demonstration that the system works, protocols are enforced, and resistance is futile.

The Most Important Thing to Understand

This isn't a conspiracy theory.

Every fact in this article is documented by official Quadripartite sources, government websites, and legal documents.

The UN organizations openly describe their One Health framework.
They proudly announce their executive meetings and action plans.
They explicitly state their goal to implement One Health globally.
They clearly define their authority over animal, human, plant, and environmental health.

They're not hiding it.

They just aren't advertising it.

Because if people understood what One Health actually means—that four UN-dominated organizations now govern health policy worldwide—there might be resistance.

Better to implement quietly. Get countries to sign agreements before citizens notice. Integrate it into trade standards so refusal becomes economically impossible. Frame it all as "health and safety" so objection sounds selfish.

By the time people realize what happened, it's too late to stop.

The ostriches proved it works.

What You Can Do

This isn't hopeless. But it requires understanding what you're fighting:

1. Understand the Structure

The UN Quadripartite (FAO, UNEP, WHO, WOAH) controls One Health
One Health governs animal, human, plant, and environmental policy
Countries implement through "binding" agreements
Your elected officials have surrendered authority

2. Demand Transparency

Force your government to disclose what One Health protocols they've agreed to
Require parliamentary debate before any new international health agreements
Demand public access to Quadripartite communications with your government

3. Support Sovereignty Protection

Push for laws protecting national sovereignty from international agreements
Demand withdrawal clauses in any health treaties
Support challenges to agreements that lack proper democratic approval

4. Resist the Language

When you hear "One Health," recognize it as UN governance.
When you hear "international standards," understand these are Quadripartite protocols.
When officials say "we have no choice," know they surrendered that choice.

5. Learn from Countries That Refused

The US, Germany, Austria, Italy, Czech Republic—all maintained sovereignty while cooperating internationally. Study how they resisted. Demand your country do the same.

6. Connect the Dots

Every "health emergency" strengthens One Health.
Every protocol enforced normalizes the system.
Every alternative suppressed proves they fear competition.

The ostrich massacre wasn't about bird flu. It was about proving One Health works.

The Bottom Line

A UN-controlled framework called "One Health" now governs health policy worldwide.

Most people don't know it exists.
Most governments signed onto it without public debate.
Most countries implement it through "voluntary" agreements backed by trade threats.
Most citizens have no mechanism to resist or even vote on it.

And when the system works exactly as designed—when 330 healthy ostriches are killed to enforce One Health protocols—officials shrug and say "international standards required it."

The UN didn't invade Canada.
They didn't need to.
They just convinced Canada to sign away sovereignty in exchange for trade access and the illusion of "global leadership."

The Quadripartite writes the protocols. WHO/WOAH define the standards.
Countries enforce them. Citizens comply.

That's the chain of command.

That's the One Health agenda.

And that's why the ostriches died.

The question is: What dies next?

Your farm? Your pets? Your medical freedom? Your property rights? Your food choices? Your ability to question official narratives?

Because under One Health, anything can be declared a "health threat."

And once declared, the protocols kick in "without delay."

No vote. No debate. No choice.

Just compliance.

Or consequences.