Global Agencies

Follow the Money: Why WHO and WEF Needed Those Ostriches Dead

The Billion-Dollar Vaccine Agenda Behind Canada's Ostrich Massacre When more than 314 immune ostriches were brutally murdered (they suffered) in British Columbia on November 7, 2025, the official story was biosecurity. Disease control. International obligations. Protecting public health.

Avery Lane

16 Nov 2025 • 16 min read

Photo by Elizabeth / Unsplash

The Billion-Dollar Vaccine Agenda Behind Canada's Ostrich Massacre

When more than 314 immune ostriches were brutally murdered (they suffered) in British Columbia on November 7, 2025, the official story was biosecurity. Disease control. International obligations. Protecting public health.

But follow the money, and a very different picture emerges.

Those birds didn't die to stop a virus. They died to protect a multi-billion-dollar pandemic preparedness industry that had just locked in its power through a new global treaty—an industry that cannot afford living proof that natural immunity works.

The Empire Built on Perpetual Pandemic Fear

Let's start with some names you need to know:

CEPI - The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. Launched at the World Economic Forum's 2017 Annual Meeting in Davos. Initial funding: $540 million from the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and multiple governments.

GAVI - The Vaccine Alliance. Another Gates-funded initiative, launched at the WEF's 2000 Annual Meeting. Has delivered over 1 billion COVID-19 vaccines and claims to have "saved 13 million lives."

WHO - The World Health Organization. Sets global health policy, declares pandemics, and coordinates international disease response.

WEF - The World Economic Forum. The unelected global body that brings these players together, hosts their meetings, and coordinates their agendas.

Notice the pattern? The same organizations, the same funding sources, the same revolving door of personnel. They meet in Davos, they plan in Geneva, and they profit everywhere.

And they all have one thing in common: they need pandemics.

Not to stop them. To manage them. To control the response. To ensure the vaccines get made, distributed, and mandated. To keep the money flowing and the power centralizing.

Disease X: The Pre-Selected Pandemic

Here's something that should make your blood run cold.

In 2021, GAVI—the global vaccine alliance—publicly discussed that bird flu is the next "Disease X."

Disease X is the WHO's term for an unknown pathogen that will cause the next pandemic. It's the boogeyman they use to justify billions in "pandemic preparedness" spending.

But here's the thing: they already knew what it would be.

By 2023, the World Economic Forum, WHO, and CEPI had all positioned H5N1 avian influenza as Disease X. Not Ebola. Not some unknown virus. Bird flu.

Dr. Shyam Bishen, Head of Health and Healthcare at the World Economic Forum, stated in March 2023: "With the H5N1 bird flu virus currently circulating freely among birds and various animal species the chance of it mutating to become more infectious in humans has increased."

Jeremy Farrar, former Wellcome director and now WHO Chief Scientist, called H5N1's pandemic potential a "big worry" and has been pushing for immediate vaccine development.

Think about what this means. The next pandemic wasn't predicted. It was selected.

They chose bird flu. They positioned it. They started developing vaccines for it. They built the infrastructure to respond to it.

And then, right on schedule, it became the crisis they needed.

The Vaccine Pipeline: Already Built and Waiting

Here's where it gets really interesting.

The WHO doesn't just wait for pandemics to happen. It "routinely selects strains derived from the animal reservoir as vaccine candidates" for avian influenza viruses.

Translation: They're making bird flu vaccines before there's a human pandemic.

In July 2024—just four months before the ostriches were killed—the WHO launched a major initiative to "advance mRNA vaccine development against human avian influenza (H5N1)." They partnered with pharmaceutical manufacturers to establish "proof-of-concept in preclinical models."

The stated goal? "Bolstering pandemic preparedness efforts."

Meanwhile, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control had already circulated H5 candidate vaccine viruses to manufacturers. The Washington Post reported in April 2024 that "candidate vaccine viruses appear well matched to protect against the H5N1 strain circulating among dairy cattle and birds."

Read that again. They already had vaccine candidates ready. Before widespread human infection. Before a pandemic declaration.

They were just waiting for the right moment.

Event 201: The Dress Rehearsal

If you think this sounds familiar, you're not crazy.

In October 2019—just weeks before COVID-19 emerged—the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation hosted "Event 201."

It was a pandemic tabletop exercise. A simulation. A dress rehearsal.

The scenario? A novel coronavirus causing a global pandemic.

The recommendations that came out of Event 201 are chilling in retrospect:

"Governments should provide more resources and support for the development and surge manufacturing of vaccines"
"Industry, national governments, and international organizations should work together to enhance internationally held stockpiles of medical countermeasures"
"Governments and the private sector should assign a greater priority to developing methods to combat mis- and disinformation prior to the next pandemic response"

That last one is particularly revealing. Before the pandemic even happened, they were planning how to censor dissent.

Three months later, COVID-19 appeared. And every single one of those recommendations became policy.

The same playbook is now being run with H5N1. The infrastructure is built. The vaccines are in development. The censorship mechanisms are ready.

They're just waiting for the crisis.

The May 2025 Pandemic Agreement: Locking in Control

Now we get to the smoking gun.

On May 20, 2025—six months before the ostriches were killed—the 78th World Health Assembly adopted the WHO Pandemic Agreement.

This wasn't just another bureaucratic document. This was a power grab of historic proportions.

The Agreement creates:

A "Coordinating Financial Mechanism" for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Translation: A global funding apparatus that bypasses national control.

A "Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network" to facilitate "equitable, timely, rapid, safe and affordable access to health products." Translation: WHO-controlled vaccine distribution that supersedes national sovereignty.

Mandatory participation by pharmaceutical manufacturers in what they call the "PABS system"—ensuring "equitable and timely access to pandemic-related health products tailored to meet public health needs."

Translation: Pharmaceutical companies get guaranteed markets, guaranteed profits, and legal protection—all coordinated by unelected international bodies.

The Agreement entered force in September 2025.

Two months later, Canada killed the immune ostriches.

Why Natural Immunity is a Threat to the System

Now we can see why those birds had to die.

The Universal Ostrich Farm ostriches did something that threatens the entire pandemic industrial complex: they survived.

Out of over 400 birds exposed to H5N1, 314 lived. They developed natural immunity. They were healthy, thriving, and no longer contagious after eleven months.

This creates several catastrophic problems for the pandemic preparedness industry:

Problem #1: It proves culling is unnecessary.

If birds can survive H5N1 and develop immunity, why are we killing 166 million birds? Why are we creating food shortages and driving up egg prices? Why are we spending billions on "disease control" that clearly doesn't control the disease?

The ostriches proved that the stamping-out policy—the very foundation of the response—doesn't work and isn't needed.

Problem #2: It proves natural immunity works.

This is the big one. If ostriches can develop natural immunity to H5N1, that immunity could be studied, replicated, perhaps even transferred. Those birds were producing H5N1 antibodies in their eggs—antibodies that could potentially be harvested and used therapeutically.

Natural immunity doesn't require vaccine manufacturers. It doesn't require emergency authorizations. It doesn't require global supply chains or coordinating financial mechanisms.

It's free. It's natural. It works. Isn't Mother Nature amazing?

And that makes it worthless to the people who profit from pandemics.

Problem #3: It undermines the pandemic narrative.

The entire H5N1-as-Disease-X scenario depends on the virus being an existential threat. Highly lethal. Impossible to survive without intervention. Requiring immediate, massive, coordinated global response.

However, if hundreds of birds can survive it naturally, developing immunity over time, suddenly it's not so scary. Suddenly people might ask: Why the panic? Why the emergency powers? Why the rush to vaccinate?

Those questions cannot be allowed.

Problem #4: It threatens the timeline.

The WHO Pandemic Agreement just entered force. The infrastructure is built. The vaccine candidates are ready. The pharmaceutical partnerships are locked in.

They need an H5N1 pandemic—or at least the credible threat of one—to justify all of it. To activate all those mechanisms. To start the money flowing.

Living proof that H5N1 can be survived naturally, that immunity develops, that the threat is manageable—that evidence had to be eliminated before it contaminated the narrative.

The Financial Stakes: Billions in Play

Let's talk numbers.

CEPI has received hundreds of millions in funding specifically for pandemic preparedness. The organization received an initial investment of $540 million, with ongoing contributions from governments and foundations.

The WHO's Pandemic Fund, launched in partnership with the World Bank, is designed to mobilize billions for pandemic preparedness, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

GAVI has delivered over 1 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses. The revenue generated for pharmaceutical companies is in the tens of billions.

The global influenza vaccine market alone is projected to reach $7.6 billion by 2030. And that's just seasonal flu.

An H5N1 pandemic would require vaccines for billions of people. At scale, you're looking at a multi-hundred-billion-dollar market.

Even better for the manufacturers: the WHO Pandemic Agreement guarantees them priority access to markets, coordinates global distribution, and—critically—ensures "equitable access" which means governments will buy vaccines for countries that can't afford them.

Taxpayer-funded guaranteed sales. No marketing costs. Legal immunity from side effects. Government-mandated uptake.

It's the perfect business model.

But only if there's a pandemic.

The Web of Influence: Who Really Governs?

Let's map the connections:

The WEF hosts the annual meetings where pandemic policy is coordinated. It launched CEPI in 2017. It co-organized Event 201 with Gates and Johns Hopkins in 2019. It actively promotes the WHO Pandemic Agreement.

The Gates Foundation funds CEPI, GAVI, and contributes heavily to WHO. Bill Gates is a regular speaker at WEF events and a key driver of global vaccine policy.

WHO sets global health policy, declares pandemics, and now—through the Pandemic Agreement—controls international response mechanisms and pharmaceutical supply chains.

CEPI develops and funds vaccine candidates for emerging diseases, with a particular focus on H5N1.

GAVI distributes vaccines globally, coordinating with governments and pharmaceutical companies.

Pharmaceutical manufacturers like Pfizer, Moderna, GSK, and Sanofi participate in the PABS system, getting guaranteed access to global markets through WHO coordination.

It's a closed loop. The same people fund the organizations that set the policies that benefit the companies those same people invest in.

And national governments—like Canada—act as enforcement arms for this international cartel.

The Canadian Connection: Useful Enforcers

Canada didn't kill those ostriches because Canadian scientists determined it was necessary.

Canada killed them because the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH)—the Paris-based international body—has a "stamping out" policy that Canada is obligated to follow.

Throughout the court proceedings, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency cited "international obligations" and "internationally recognized biosecurity standards."

Not Canadian evidence. Not Canadian science. Not Canadian interests.

International compliance.

When RFK Jr., the Director of the NIH, and the FDA Commissioner all requested that Canada spare the birds for research, their appeals were ignored.

Why? Because WOAH policy doesn't have an exemption for "inconvenient immunity."

And WOAH policy serves the same interests as WHO policy, which serves the same interests as WEF priorities, which serves the same interests as pharmaceutical profits.

Canada chose compliance with unelected international bodies over collaboration with American health officials. They chose protocol over science. They chose global coordination over national sovereignty.

They became the enforcement arm for a system that benefits everyone except Canadians.

There was solid evidence - 11 months with no spread, no regional outbreak, and no risk to other farms.

2025 — WHO Pandemic Agreement negotiations continue, with adoption and enforcement still uncertain.
Implementation timelines remain fluid, and different governments face growing pressure over sovereignty, public health authority, and global coordination.

The resistant ostriches remained healthy for nearly a year with no transmission.
They were destroyed despite posing no documented threat — eliminating real-world evidence of natural immunity and non-pharmaceutical disease management.

They were killed because of the WHO Pandemic Agreement—with its pharmaceutical supply chains and vaccine coordination mechanisms—entered force.

That's not biosecurity. That's eliminating inconvenient evidence.

What the Ostriches Represented

Those 314 birds weren't just livestock. They were proof of concept.

Proof that H5N1 can be survived. Proof that natural immunity develops. Proof that culling isn't necessary. Proof that the pandemic narrative is oversold. Proof that natural solutions exist outside the pharmaceutical industry.

They were living, breathing evidence that threatened a multi-billion-dollar agenda years in the making.

Karen Espersen and Katie Pasitney, the farm owners, tried to tell anyone who would listen: these birds are producing H5N1 antibodies. They've developed immunity. They could help us understand how to fight this virus naturally.

They were working with researchers in Japan on antibody extraction. They had a partnership with Kyoto Prefectural University. They were developing methods to mass-produce ostrich antibodies against H5N1.

This wasn't theoretical. This was actionable science that could have led to natural therapeutics.

Instead, sharpshooters corralled the birds behind hay bales and executed them all in a single night.

The research was destroyed. The antibodies were lost. The evidence was eliminated.

And the pandemic preparedness industry could continue selling the only solution they'll allow: their vaccines.

The Questions We're Not Supposed to Ask

Why did GAVI, WEF, and WHO all identify bird flu as "Disease X" years in advance?

Why does the WHO Pandemic Agreement guarantee pharmaceutical manufacturers access to global markets?

Why did Canada ignore requests from U.S. health officials to preserve the ostriches for research?

Why were the birds killed just two months after the Pandemic Agreement entered force?

Why won't they allow natural immunity to be studied as an alternative?

Why is compliance with international protocols more important than evidence?

Why do unelected bodies in Geneva and Paris have more authority over Canadian farms than Canadian officials?

And most importantly: Who benefits from keeping the pandemic threat alive?

The Answer: The Same People Who Created the System

The World Economic Forum doesn't just predict crises. It creates the frameworks to manage them.

The WHO doesn't just respond to pandemics. It positions them, prepares for them, and profits from them.

The pharmaceutical industry doesn't just make vaccines. It shapes policy, funds the organizations that set global health priorities, and ensures those priorities require their products.

This isn't conspiracy theory. This is documented partnership. Public-private cooperation. Stakeholder capitalism.

It's all out in the open. They announce it at Davos. They publish it in agreements. They celebrate it in press releases.

What they don't advertise is what happens when evidence contradicts the plan.

Like 314 immune ostriches that proved natural solutions work.

Those birds are dead. The research is gone. The evidence is eliminated.

And the pandemic preparedness industry can continue operating without the inconvenient truth that maybe—just maybe—nature already knows how to solve the problem they're selling us solutions for.

The Pattern: Suppress Natural Immunity, Mandate Interventions

This isn't the first time we've seen this pattern.

During COVID-19, any mention of natural immunity was dismissed, censored, or ridiculed. Doctors who suggested early treatment protocols were deplatformed. Studies showing natural immunity was more robust than vaccine immunity were ignored.

The message was clear: There is one solution. Vaccines. Everything else is misinformation.

Now watch the same playbook with H5N1.

Natural immunity in ostriches? Destroy it. Research into antibody production from immune birds? Shut it down. Questions about whether culling is necessary? Silence them with "international obligations."

The pattern is consistent: Suppress natural solutions. Eliminate alternatives. Create dependency on the pharmaceutical-industrial complex.

And if evidence emerges that threatens the narrative, eliminate the evidence.

What This Means for You

If you think this is just about some birds in British Columbia, you're missing the bigger picture.

This is about who controls the response to the next crisis. Who decides what solutions are allowed. Who profits from the fear.

The WHO Pandemic Agreement gives unelected international bodies the power to coordinate responses, control supply chains, and ensure pharmaceutical participation.

National governments become enforcement mechanisms for international policy.

Evidence that contradicts the plan gets suppressed—whether it's immune ostriches or doctors questioning protocols or citizens asking uncomfortable questions.

The system is designed to perpetuate itself. To create dependencies. To eliminate alternatives.

And it's designed by people who profit when you're scared, when you're sick, and when you're dependent on their solutions.The Execution: Deliberate Cruelty

What happened on November 7, 2025, wasn't humane euthanasia. It was a massacre.

The CFIA corralled 314 ostriches—intelligent, highly social birds that the Espersen family had raised for 35 years—behind hay bales. Then professional marksmen systematically shot them, one by one, as the others watched.

Ostriches are not stupid animals. They understand danger. They bond with their flock. They recognize their caregivers. These birds had names. Personalities. Annabelle and hundreds of others who had survived a deadly virus and proven their strength.

They were forced to watch their flock mates executed in front of them. To hear the gunshots. To smell the blood. To see their family falling.

But it gets worse.

Many birds were shot multiple times and still didn't die. Some were left wounded, suffering through the night, until the marksmen returned the next morning to finish them off.

This is what the CFIA called "the most appropriate and humane option."

Intelligent, social animals—who had done nothing but survive a virus naturally—spent their last hours watching their family die, then lay bleeding through a cold November night waiting for the shooters to come back.

Karen Espersen and Katie Pasitney were at the farm—banned from the enclosure after being arrested months earlier for trying to stay with their birds. They stood at the side of the highway with supporters, close enough to hear every gunshot echoing across the property, to see the floodlights illuminating the killing field, but kept away by RCMP officers.

"CFIA you can stop!" Katie yelled into the darkness as the gunfire continued. "Run, pretty birds!"

When it was over, they still weren't allowed to approach. The CFIA refused to let them near the enclosure. Refused to let them see what remained of 35 years of work. Refused to let them pray for the animals.

"They said they were scared for their lives," Pasitney reported, her voice breaking.

Scared of what? Two women who'd been arrested months before for the crime of wanting to comfort their own birds?

The bodies were taken away. The family wasn't told where. No closure. No dignity. No respect for 35 years of care.

This wasn't about disease control. You don't leave animals suffering overnight for "biosecurity."

This was about sending a message: Challenge the system, and we will destroy everything you've built. We will kill your life's work in front of you. We will make it traumatic. We will make it brutal. We will make it cruel.

And we will make sure you can do nothing but watch and listen.

The cruelty was the point.

The research was destroyed. The antibodies were lost. The evidence was eliminated. And hundreds of birds who survived H5N1 were shot, left to suffer, and finished off the next morning.

Two months after the WHO's pharmaceutical distribution system went live.

The Pattern: COVID Repeated

During COVID-19, natural immunity was dismissed, censored, ridiculed. Doctors suggesting early treatments were deplatformed. Studies showing natural immunity outperformed vaccines were ignored.

The message: one solution only. Vaccines. Everything else is misinformation.

Now watch the same playbook with H5N1:

Natural immunity in ostriches? Destroy it. Research into natural antibodies? Shut it down. Questions about whether culling works? "International obligations."

Suppress natural solutions. Eliminate alternatives. Create pharmaceutical dependency.

And when evidence emerges that threatens the narrative, eliminate the evidence.

The Resistance Starts with Seeing Clearly

Those ostriches died because they were inconvenient.

Not dangerous. Inconvenient.

They proved that the multi-billion-dollar pandemic preparedness industry built by the WEF, WHO, Gates Foundation, and pharmaceutical companies might not be necessary.

They showed that natural immunity works. That culling isn't required. That maybe the virus isn't the existential threat we're being told it is.

So they were eliminated. Quickly. Quietly. Efficiently.

And most people will never know why.

But you do now.

You know about CEPI, launched at Davos to fund pandemic vaccines before pandemics exist.

You know about Event 201, where they rehearsed the COVID response months before COVID appeared.

You know about the WHO Pandemic Agreement, locking in pharmaceutical control of global health response.

You know about the timeline—the perfect coordination between vaccine development, international agreements, and the elimination of evidence.

You know who benefits. You know who governs. You know who profits.

The question is: what are you going to do with that knowledge?

The Choice Ahead

Canada is no longer governed by Canadians. It's governed by compliance officers enforcing policies set in Geneva, Paris, and Davos. Most Canadians have not received this memo.

The WHO Pandemic Agreement is in force. The infrastructure is built. The next "pandemic" is positioned.

And the people who profit from perpetual crisis are counting on you not connecting the dots.

They're counting on you accepting "international obligations" without asking who set those obligations.

They're counting on you trusting "the science" without asking who funds the scientists.

They're counting on you believing in biosecurity threats without asking who benefits from the response.

But those 314 ostriches—healthy, immune, producing antibodies that could have helped millions—they're counting on something else.

They're counting on you to remember that they proved natural immunity works.

That they showed culling was unnecessary.

That they threatened a multi-billion-dollar agenda with something as simple as survival.

And that they were killed for it.

Not by a virus.

By a system that cannot afford the truth.

The ostriches of Universal Ostrich Farm survived H5N1 against all odds, developed natural immunity, and were producing antibodies that could have led to natural therapeutics. They were destroyed on November 7, 2025—two months after the WHO Pandemic Agreement entered force—not because they were dangerous, but because they were proof that the billion-dollar pandemic preparedness industry might be unnecessary.

This is the second in a series investigating the forces behind the ostrich massacre and what it reveals about who really governs Canada.

Sources and References

Ostrich Cull Documentation

All sources from Part 1 article regarding the Universal Ostrich Farm case, court proceedings, and scientific evidence of immunity.

Author's Note: This investigation is based entirely on publicly available documents, official statements, and acknowledged partnerships between the organizations mentioned. Nothing in this article is speculation—it's all documented fact. The connections exist. The timeline is real. The financial interests are clear. Draw your own conclusions.